Peace & Justice in Modern World

Imperialism didn't end. These Days it's known as International Law Imperialism didn't end. These Days it's known as International Law An Article by George Monbiot, British writer and political activist, published at "The Guardian" on April 30, 2012 A one-sided justice sees weaker states punished as rich nation... More detail
The Russian Federation tested by Multipolarism The Russian Federation tested by Multipolarism An article by Tiberio Graziani, President of IsAG – Institute for Advanced Studies in Geopolitics and Auxiliary Sciences, director of Geopolitica, Journal of IsAG The structurin... More detail
This is Spain's Destiny This is Spain's Destiny An Article by Javier Solana, President of the ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, for El País, published at "The Guardian" on March 29, 2011 Our role as a bridge b... More detail

Solidarity Economies for Humane Society

Plutonomy And The Precariat Plutonomy And The Precariat An Arcticle by Noam Chomsky, Institute Professor Emeritus in the MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, published at Outlookindia.com on May 10, 2012 ... More detail
The World is Not Flat The World is Not Flat An Interview with Joseph Stiglitz, professor at Columbia University and a recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, published at U.S.News &a... More detail
Goodbye, Neo-liberalism and Austerity. Hello, Democratic Socialism and Hope Goodbye, Neo-liberalism and Austerity. Hello, Democratic Socialism and Hope A Note by Kamran Mofid, Founder of the NGO "Globalisation for the Common Good Initiative", published at his Blog on May 7, 2012 Voters in France and Greece d... More detail

Sustainability of Modern World and Future

World Day For Cultural Diversity World Day For Cultural Diversity World Day for Cultural Diversity for Dialogue and Development is being observed by the United Nations for the 10th time on May, 21 Initially the Universal De... More detail
The Current Crisis Draws the Line Under the Basic Results of “Globalization” The Current Crisis Draws the Line Under the Basic Results of “Globalization” Opening address by Founding President of the World Public Forum "Dialogue of Civilizations" Vladimir Yakunin at the opening of the Plenary Meeting of the 9th ... More detail
Decoloniality and the Communal Decoloniality and the Communal The second part of Interview with Walter Mignolo, William H. Wannamaker Professor and Director, Center for Global studies and the Humanities, Duke University ... More detail

We wish to present you the Editorial article of The Observer, published 16 August 2009 and commented by the WPF "DoC" ICC member and Founder of the Globalisation for the Common Good Initiative Kamran Mofid.

Put your trust in Socrates, not economists

Editorial

The Observer, Sunday 16 August 2009

THE WISDOM OF Socrates was famously summarised as his ability to know that he knew nothing. So in modern times he would probably be an economist.

Few saw the credit crunch coming. Since it arrived, opinions as to the severity of its consequences, its effects on different nations and the prescriptions to remedy them have varied wildly.

Last week, it was revealed that France and Germany are emerging from recession, each recording fractional amounts of GDP growth in the last quarter. This was seized upon as evidence that the old industrial engine at the heart of the eurozone is as robust as ever. Britain, by contrast, with its financial services-dependent economy, is all hollowed out.

Except, only a few months ago, the old industrial engine at the heart of the eurozone was known to be heading for the scrapheap of history. France and Germany, reliant on manufacturing exports, had seen global demand for their produce disappear and their economies were not flexible enough to adapt. Britain's nimble market economy, by contrast, was going to enjoy a surprise recovery.

Except, a few months before that, Britain's ultra-free market economy was the epicentre of the credit crunch, certain to be laid waste, while France and Germany, with their state safety nets, would be spared the worst.

Except, a few months before that, the sclerotic, state-heavy continental model was doomed unless it followed fleet-footed Anglo-Saxon economies down the path of liberalisation.

And that is only within Europe. A similar game of intellectual ping pong has been played out with the relative strengths and weaknesses of Asian economies being compared with each other, the US and Europe.

What conclusions can be drawn from such a confusing picture? One might be that, as Nassim Nicholas Taleb argues on these pages, we should be wary of experts. Alternatively, we might be in awe of how tough a job it is making sense of the global economy.

Another is that we should stop comparing national economies as if they were running a race. Plainly, they are not. Supply and demand do not respect borders. For one country to have a surplus, another must be running a deficit. It is imbalances between economies that puts prosperity at risk; the way different nations structure their economies within the globalised market probably matters less than we like to think.

If we stopped comparing the "competitiveness" of national economic models, we could devote more attention to what kind of society we want, and what economic policies will get us there. That, indeed, is probably the economic equivalent of another famous Socratic injunction: know thyself.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2009

Comments by Kamran Mofid:

While in general I support this editorial, I wish also to mention that there were and indeed there are economists who saw all this coming within the profession and discipline ages ago. I, myself, inspired by those before me, began the journey of self-discovery a decade or so ago and noted that:

"The focus of economics should be on the benefit and the bounty that the economy produces, on how to let this bounty increase, and how to share the benefits justly among the people for the common good, removing the evils that hinder this process. Moreover, economic investigation should be accompanied by research into subjects such as anthropology, philosophy, politics and most importantly, theology, to give insight into our own mystery, as no economic theory or no economist can say who we are, where have we come from or where we are going to. Humankind must be respected as the centre of creation and not relegated by more short term economic interests"...

Please see: Link 1
On "The Roots of Economics-And why it has gone so wrong", please see: Link 2 (Chapter 4, PP.23-44).

After so many years of struggle to promote the study of true economics, I am over-the-moon to see that all over the world, this is exactly what has begun. I wish all my fellow economists who have been at the forefront of this struggle the best. Our subject and our profession deserves better and hopefully in due course we can train and educate better economists.

Kamran Mofid PhD (ECON)
Founder, Globalisation for the Common Good Initiative
www.globalisationforthecommongood.info
Co-editor, Journal of Globalisation for the Common Good
www.commongoodjournal.com

Globalisation for the Common Good, Chicago 2009

Globalisation for the Common Good, California 2010


 

Put your trust in Socrates, not economists

Connect With Us